You are here: TUCS > PUBLICATIONS > Publication Search > Quantitative Model Refinement ...
Quantitative Model Refinement in Four Different Frameworks, with Applications to the Heat Shock Response
Diana-Elena Gratie, Bogdan Iancu, Sepinoud Azimi, Ion Petre, Quantitative Model Refinement in Four Different Frameworks, with Applications to the Heat Shock Response. In: Luigia Petre, Emil Sekerinski (Eds.), From Action Systems to Distributed Systems, 201–2014, Taylor & Francis, 2016.
Abstract:
Quantitative model refinement is an essential step in the model development cycle. Starting with a high level, abstract representation of a biological system, one often needs to add details to this representation to reflect changes in its constituent elements. Any such refinement step has two aspects: one structural and one quantitative. The structural
aspect of the refinement defines an increase in the resolution of its representation, while the
quantitative one specifies a numerical setup for the model that ensures its fit preservation at every refinement step. We discuss in this paper the implementation of quantitative model refinement in four extensively used bio-modelling frameworks: ODE-based models, rule-based models, Petri net models, and guarded command language models, emphasizing the
specificity for every model implementation. We argue that quantitative model refinement is framework-independent, being implementable in all chosen frameworks despite their different underlying modelling paradigms.
BibTeX entry:
@INBOOK{cGrIaAzPe16a,
title = {Quantitative Model Refinement in Four Different Frameworks, with Applications to the Heat Shock Response},
booktitle = {From Action Systems to Distributed Systems},
author = {Gratie, Diana-Elena and Iancu, Bogdan and Azimi, Sepinoud and Petre, Ion},
editor = {Petre, Luigia and Sekerinski, Emil},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
pages = {201–2014},
year = {2016},
ISSN = {978-0-335; 978-0-415; 978-0-84},
}
Belongs to TUCS Research Unit(s): Computational Biomodeling Laboratory (Combio Lab)
Publication Forum rating of this publication: level 2